Subject: The Scales of Injustice: Review by the Happy Guy From: gaffney@iconn.net (Sean Gaffney) Date: 1996/07/25 Message-Id: <4t6hqd$cta@news.iconn.net> Organization: i-Conn Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Review time again, sorry about the delay. This was a tough one, in many ways. SPOILERS for "The Scales of Injustice"... Y'know, I really wanted to beging this review with an old SCTV bit: "I loved it. It was much better than Cat-People. I'm going to read it again and again." Unfortunately, though the second statement is true... Now, although there are many different people who review stuff here on rec.arts.drwho, and a whole lot who are better and funnier at it than me (David, Steve, Greg, Shannon...etc.), I have, rather egotistically, come to think of myself as the radw reviewer. This means that I review every NA, MA, and Virgin "other" that comes down the pike. However, with this title carries much responsibility. F'rinstance, what opinions should I be giving? Should I review the book keeping in mind whether others will read it, or shall I give my own personal opinion? Usually giving both is not that hard. But... The Scales of Injustice is Gary Russell's best book so far. The prose is excellent, the moralistic approach is in character, and the characterization of the regulars is deep and touching. Nevertheless, for reasons I'll mention later, I *dragged* my way through this novel. What to do...well, let's do my normal review bits. Plot: I hate conspiracy plots. With a passion. That does not change the fact that the plot is very well thought-out, blithely executed, and as twisty and turny as a Mara. There were times where I could read Gary's thoughts as he wrote the next bit... (that's good, btw) The Doctor: See below. Plus, he seemed underused. He may have been there a lot, but most of the time he observed. In Season 7, Pertwee wouldn't have been trapped for 4 episodes without escaping *once*. Liz: Very well done. Gary ignores Prisoners of the Sun (which seemed more like a fever dream, anyway) and gives Liz a real motivation for leaving. The last few pages put a lump in your throat. UNIT: The Brig is the tragedy of the piece, and it's done with all the pain Gary could muster. Good ties to Downtime. Yates is excellent, but best of all is Benton. Who gets a speech! With whole paragraphs of exposition! Wow! Villains (so to speak): I did have a little more trouble getting into the heads of these Silurians, as opposed to Malcolm Hulke's book. But they're pretty well done. The description of the Myrka as terrifying was the best joke in the book. Style: Similar at times to Who Killed Kennedy (this is *not* a good thing), Gary's prose flows much better than his other two. I'd like to see more, now. Perhaps a different Doctor. He does a good Malcolm Hulke, too. Where were the interior illustrations? (I know, talk to Andy Lane...) Why Sean Is Waffling: You gotta understand, I love Jon Pertwee. The man was a brilliant showman, and his appearance at a con I went to was a delight. But if I ranked the Doctors, the third would be at the bottom. He irritates me, and worse, he bores me. That's probably the fault of Barry and Terrance rather than Jon. However, it means a struggle getting through a MA. I took a long time to finish Chris Bulis' book, too. (I'd rather not go into The Ghosts of N-Space right now, thank you). So that was one problem. Then, as I mantioned, I hate conspiracy books. It was one of the reasons I couldn't finish Who Killed Kennedy. (The other being that the protagonist was a complete a**hole.) Thus, a major part of this book was just not my thing at all. But, a lot of people loved WKK, just as a huge amount of people love the third Doctor. So, here's the solution to my dilemma. For Pertwee enthusiasts, X-Files fans, and people looking for a good read: 9/10. For me: 6/10. PS: You'll notice I didn't mention the Introduction. You're right, I didn't. And Corporal Bell changes her name after 2 pages. ;-) --Sean Gaffney --"You git! I thought you were dead! Git git git!" - Benny, No Future